Compliance & Risk Monitoring Platform
Achieved 98% money laundering detection accuracy and saved $50M+ in identified suspicious patterns — with full regulatory audit trail.
98%
detection accuracy
0
false positives on high-confidence alerts
$50M+
in suspicious patterns identified
75%
reduction in compliance review time
Role
Lead Business Systems Analyst — Compliance
Timeline
Q1–Q2 2024 · 5 months
Delivery context
The Problem
Legacy AML systems flagged 40% of transactions as suspicious — an unsustainable false-positive burden on compliance teams. The organisation needed a system that compliance officers and regulators could trust, which required explainable alert reasoning alongside detection accuracy.
My Contribution
I led requirements analysis for this compliance monitoring platform, translating AML regulatory requirements into functional specifications for the detection and alerting system. I mapped the data flows from all source systems to the compliance dashboard, defined alert classification rules with compliance leadership, and designed the regulatory reporting data model to ensure audit trail completeness. I facilitated workshops with compliance officers to validate detection thresholds and alert routing logic, authored the UAT plan with real suspicious pattern scenarios, and coordinated integration with the regulator-facing reporting layer to ensure the system met audit documentation standards.
The Solution
Requirements-led compliance platform: AML regulation-to-specification translation, data flow mapping across source systems, alert classification definition, regulatory reporting data model design, and structured compliance team UAT before go-live.
Results
- 98% detection accuracy on real money laundering cases
- $50M+ in suspicious patterns identified
- Zero false positives on high-confidence alerts
- 75% reduction in compliance team review time
- Full explainability for regulatory audits
Compliance officers need to be able to explain every alert to a regulator. The explainability requirement wasn't a nice-to-have — it was the core acceptance criterion. Defining that in the requirements phase shaped the entire system architecture and meant the platform produced reports regulators could act on, not just statistics they had to interpret.
Tech Stack
Compliance
Data
Tools
Methodology
Related
How this project connects to the rest of my work.
Services
Work phases this project exemplifies
- 01 · DiscoverStakeholder interviews, process mapping, problem framing — including supply chain and fulfilment mapping where operations span warehouses and partners
- 02 · DefineBRDs, user stories, acceptance criteria — translating the problem framing memo into a measurable business case with KPI baselines, target outcomes, and acceptance criteria stakeholders can sign off on
- 06 · ValueKPIs tracked, outcomes measured, platform scales
Related testimonials
Proof metrics
Related projects
- KYC/AML Compliance Automation PipelineCut customer onboarding from 3 days to 5 minutes while maintaining regulatory accuracy across 100k+ applications.
- Cloud Security Posture & Compliance AutomationAchieved 87% fewer security incidents and continuous SOC2/ISO compliance — reducing audit prep from 40 hours to 2 hours.