cpdeol
← Back to Projects
Compliance + Automation

KYC/AML Compliance Automation Pipeline

Cut customer onboarding from 3 days to 5 minutes while maintaining regulatory accuracy across 100k+ applications.

5 min

onboarding time (was 3 days)

87%

auto-approved without review

99.5%

data extraction accuracy

92%

reduction in manual review queue

Role

Lead Technical Business Analyst — Compliance

Timeline

Q4 2022–Q1 2023 · 4 months

Delivery context

KYC/AMLFINTRACSQLComplianceAgile

The Problem

Manual KYC/AML processes took 2-3 days, creating poor customer experience and causing significant signup abandonment. Compliance teams manually reviewed documents with error-prone workflows that couldn't scale. FINTRAC reporting for Large Cash Transactions (LCTR), Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR), and Electronic Funds Transfer Reporting (EFTR) required precise data attribute mapping across multiple source systems.

My Contribution

I owned requirements analysis and compliance alignment for this KYC/AML automation initiative at a major Canadian bank. I extracted and mapped FINTRAC-specific data attributes across source systems, defined the transformation and validation rules for LCTR, STR, and EFTR reporting, and facilitated workshops with AML and compliance teams to define automated decision thresholds. I analyzed and cleansed datasets to improve data quality prior to system integration, designed the UAT framework with compliance officers to validate regulatory accuracy, and collaborated with AML stakeholders to implement robust validation and enrichment processes that met FINTRAC audit standards.

Process

  1. Regulatory Mapping

    Extracted and mapped FINTRAC-specific data attributes across source systems, defining the required capture and transformation for LCTR, STR, and EFTR.

  2. Compliance Workshops

    Facilitated sessions with AML and compliance teams to validate automated approval thresholds and define escalation criteria for edge cases.

  3. Data Quality

    Profiled, cleansed, and standardized source datasets; documented anomalies and established validation rules for source-to-target integrity.

  4. UAT & Sign-off

    Ran parallel manual reviews for 3 weeks, validating automated decisions against compliance officer judgements before full cutover.

The Solution

Requirements-led automation: FINTRAC data attribute mapping, transformation rule definition, compliance threshold workshops, data quality assessment and cleansing, and a structured UAT process run in parallel with manual review for 3 weeks before switching to automated flow.

Results

  • Onboarding reduced from 3 days to under 5 minutes
  • 99.5% data extraction accuracy
  • 87% of applications auto-approved without human review
  • 92% reduction in manual review queue
  • 100k+ applications processed with zero compliance incidents
Key learning
Regulatory compliance is a data quality problem before it is a technology problem. The automation only worked because we spent the first month mapping every FINTRAC data attribute to a clean, validated source — trying to automate against dirty data would have created a compliance liability, not a solution.

Tech Stack

Compliance

FINTRAC LCTRSTREFTRAML

Data

SQLSSMSETLData Profiling

Tools

JIRAConfluenceSharePointVisio

Methodology

Agile/ScrumWaterfallUATBRD/TDD

Related

How this project connects to the rest of my work.